However, for the absolute novice, these concepts can still be confusing Our poker strategy articles also introduce you to strategies for limit play, sit and gos SNGs , and freeroll tournaments. If you are beginning your poker career, you can take advantage of some great software that will quickly identify errors and leaks in your online play Cookies help us deliver our services. However, I think cash games have got tougher in relative terms compared to tournaments. As time went on, this gradually went away, I think partly because I became a better poker player and learnt to accept the realities of the game So in this guide we walk you through the setup and implementation of the software in one simple guide
Online Poker Strategy & Theory
This is because there is no stable equilibrium or too many equilibria to count, depending on whom you ask. Thus there is no unexploitable strategy. If you never bluff in this spot, the bot will still pay you off at the same rate. An exploitative player would stop paying you off after a while, and win even more.
If when you flop the nuts you bet 1. It just plays GTO. A friend of mine went to graduate school with one of the best online players in the world, and had a chance to watch him play. According to the pro:. The point is, the best player in online poker last year on a per-hand basis plays GTO.
And then he actually does it. In the short term, the humans are converging on GTO more quickly. I took some flack on Twitter for comparing the small-bet, check-down game happening between Daniel Negreanu , Dan Colman and Christoph Vogelsang to a nightly satellite at a local casino.
But it sure did look like none of the players were trying to pressure the others. And why should they? On other hand, if one guy pushed, he knew the others knew how to fight back. For about two hours, three of the best short-handed NLHE players in the world checked or small-bet every hand, until Vogelsang, the short stack, busted.
Do you need to play GTO in order to win? Or rather, how close do you need to get to GTO in order to hold your own against a strong set of opponents? Was it essentially solved three years ago? Players bet on their hands in a number of rounds as cards are drawn, employing various mathematical and intuitive strategies in an attempt to better opponents.
Given the game's many different forms and various dynamics, poker strategy becomes a complex subject. This article attempts to introduce only the basic strategy concepts. The fundamental theorem of poker , introduced by David Sklansky , states: Every time you play your hand the way you would if you could see your opponents' cards, you gain, and every time your opponents play their cards differently from the way they would play them if they could see your cards, you gain.
For example, bluffing and slow-playing explained below are examples of using deception to induce your opponents to play differently from how they would if they could see your cards.
There are some exceptions to the fundamental theorem in certain multi-way pot situations, as described in Morton's theorem. The relationship between pot odds and odds of winning is one of the most important concepts in poker strategy. Pot odds are the ratio of the size of the pot to the size of the bet required to stay in the pot. To have a positive expectation , a player's odds of winning must be better than their pot odds. Implied odds is a more complicated concept, though related to pot odds.
The implied odds on a hand are based not on the money currently in the pot, but on the expected size of the pot at the end of the hand. When facing an even money situation like the one described in the previous paragraph and holding a strong drawing hand say a Four flush a skilled player will consider calling a bet or even opening based on their implied odds. This is particularly true in multi-way pots, where it is likely that one or more opponents will call all the way to showdown.
By employing deception, a poker player hopes to induce their opponent s to act differently from how they would if they could see their cards. Related is the semi-bluff , in which a player who does not have a strong hand, but has a chance to improve it to a strong hand in later rounds, bets strongly on the hand in the hopes of inducing other players with weaker "made" hands to fold.
Slow-playing is deceptive play in poker that is roughly the opposite of bluffing: Position refers to the order in which players are seated around the table and the strategic consequences of this. For example, if there are five opponents yet to act behind a player, there is a greater chance one of the yet to act opponents will have a better hand than if there were only one opponent yet to act.
Being in late position is an advantage because a player gets to see how their opponents in earlier position act which provides the player more information about their hands than they have about his. This information, coupled with a low bet to a late player, may allow the player to "limp in" with a weaker hand when they would have folded the same hand if they'd had to act earlier.
Position is one of the most vital elements to understand in order to be a long-term winning player. As a player's position improves, so too does the range of cards with which they can profitably enter a hand.
Conversely this commonly held knowledge can be used to an intelligent poker player's advantage. If playing against observant opponents, then a raise with any two cards can 'steal the blinds,' if executed against passive players at the right time.
Unlike calling, raising has an extra way to win: An opening bet may be considered a raise from a strategy perspective. David Sklansky gives seven reasons for raising, summarized below.
The gap concept states that a player needs a better hand to play against someone who has already opened or raised the betting than he would need to open himself. Related to the gap effect, the sandwich effect states that a player needs a stronger hand to stay in a pot when there are opponents yet to act behind him. Therefore, a stronger hand is desired as compensation for this uncertainty. But I consider myself pretty competent in NL6max although its not my best game.
I am very interested as well. BB code is On. All times are GMT The time now is Poker Theory General poker theory. Page 1 of 7. In front of my monitor Posts: Skype study groups Hello everyone!
Send a private message to Cash Magnetic. Find More Posts by Cash Magnetic. Find Threads Started by Cash Magnetic. Skype study groups You should include your level of play. Skype study groups NL 25 just learning. Skype study groups How about a poker theory study group?
Send a private message to ItchingAgain. Find More Posts by ItchingAgain. Find Threads Started by ItchingAgain. Send a private message to MadDocs. Find More Posts by MadDocs. Find Threads Started by MadDocs. Skype study groups Yeah Im interested in overall theory but want some accent on cash. Skype study groups Would definatley be interested in joining a theory group. Find More Posts by Beattie Find Threads Started by Beattie Skype study groups Quote: Skype study groups I would also be interested in a theory Skype group, especially if we can do stuff like CrEV.
Send a private message to chinagambler. Find More Posts by chinagambler.